Brownback parody, or Brownback lunacy?


Okay, I think this site is a parody, a hoax, on U.S. Sen. Sam Brownback‘s presidential campaign.

But it’s difficult to tell, especially when stuff like this voodoo history is on Brownback’s official campaign site. Alvin Reed thinks Brownback understands “the creator” better than other candidates because he was Secretary of Agriculture in Kansas, and that made Brownback ‘closer to the soil?’

Brownback is one of the three Republicans who confessed to supporting creationism, so he has no chance of my vote in any case. All the same, I’d prefer lunatics stay out of the presidential campaign.

I have written the Brownback campaign asking them for an explanation of the heliocentrism stuff. If they are not savvy enough to have a disavowal of the Blogs4Brownback out, and the sites are not part of the campaign, he’s going to get toasted quickly.

But if the site is affiliated with him, he deserves to get toasted more quickly — already there are serious posters there defending Brownback. Someone needs to tell them Jesus died to take away their sins, not their brains ©.

More commentary from experts:

This entry was posted on Sunday, May 20th, 2007 at 9:17 pm and is filed under Bogus history, Campaigns, Creationism, Hoaxes, Intelligent Design, Politics, Voodoo history, Weblogs. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 Responses to Brownback parody, or Brownback lunacy?

  1. Trickle down economics made Kansas business dry up | Millard Fillmore's Bathtub says:
    September 30, 2014 at 12:43 pm

    […] Brownback parody, or Brownback lunacy? […]

    Like

  2. A religious bias against good education? « Millard Fillmore’s Bathtub . says:
    August 11, 2007 at 3:28 am

    […] realize the significance of that particular endorsement, study this post, and this one.  Parody?  I asked Brownback’s campaign about the site — they have not disowned it.  As Dave Barry often wrote, I could not make […]

    Like

  3. t h ray says:
    May 24, 2007 at 5:05 am

    Yes, let’s bring back epicylces to explain heliocentric motion. Perhaps the creaitonists will be kept too busy calculating to make any more mischief.

    Tom

    Like

Please play nice in the Bathtub -- splash no soap in anyone's eyes. While your e-mail will not show with comments, note that it is our policy not to allow false e-mail addresses. Comments with non-working e-mail addresses may be deleted.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.