Jargon – fuzzifying the facts, fuzzifying history


Jargon is the death of many a useful idea in large organizations. Good writers try to avoid jargon, trying instead to provide language that will be readily understood by the reader or listener, and language that is clear and precise in its meaning.

In history, jargon and buzzwords tend to obscure what is going on. Phrases like “collateral damage” are much less graphic, and useful, than phrases like “civilian casualties.” Jargon can make history a difficult task — I’m thinking of some of the documents from the Pentagon during the Vietnam War, just for example.

In a post titled “Buzzword Blingo,” Aphra Behn – Danger of Eclectic Shock has some fun with jargon, and helpfully includes links to several sites that deal with the crippling effects of jargon on learning and plain old conversation.

3 Responses to Jargon – fuzzifying the facts, fuzzifying history

  1. Aphra Behn's avatar Aphra Behn says:

    You are so right bernarda!

    Many thanks

    AB

    Like

  2. bernarda's avatar bernarda says:

    Both you and Aphra should be interested in this site, Butterflies and Wheels.

    On the righthand column it has a few things about bad vocabulary.

    http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/

    Like

  3. Aphra Behn's avatar Aphra Behn says:

    I’m really flattered you liked my post, and appreciate the link. Just one teensy thing, there’s an awkward silent ‘h’ which managed to sneak out of my second name in your reference. Pesky thing. It would be very nice if it found its way back there though.

    Many thanks.

    AB

    Like

Please play nice in the Bathtub -- splash no soap in anyone's eyes. While your e-mail will not show with comments, note that it is our policy not to allow false e-mail addresses. Comments with non-working e-mail addresses may be deleted.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.