So, Maggie Thatcher, his boss, also rejected Christopher Monckton’s preposterous claims against the science of climate change?
Who knew?
It’s clear Christopher Monckton doesn’t know . . . much of value.
Sorta disappointed Peter Sinclair didn’t go after Monckton’s preposterous insults of Jackie Kennedy and Rachel Carson, but there’s only so much debunking one can do in a limited period of time, and so much of Monckton’s work requires debunking, even cries out for debunking.
Is there anything Monckton claims which is not hoax?
Millard Fillmore's Bathtub 
Monckton’s faculties appear never to have been so sharp, but declining even faster than Thatcher’s, since she left office.
One of my favorite denialist memes popped up twice in the last month: Denialists ask, “Whatever happened to the ozone hole?” They then go on to say that concern over the ozone hole was all hoax, witness the “fact” that it’s not in the news much any more. One was incredulous when I responded that the legislation to fix the problem worked. “What legislation? What regulation? Untrue!”
Ignorance on their part doesn’t make hoax on the part of science. Especially, ignorance on their part doesn’t help end the warming.
Thanks for dropping by.
LikeLike
She was very good at taking action on the ozone hole in the 1980s. She was a chemist so she understood the problem. She used to understand the Greenhouse Effect too, but her faculties have been declining since she left office.
LikeLike
That Maggie Thatcher?
LikeLike