Found the explanation at Whiskey, Tango, Foxtrot – Over (also at Talking Points Memo):
Missouri Rep. Cynthia Davis: Poverty? Show me!
June 25, 2009The story writes its own ending. As I watched the story of Missouri State Rep. Cynthia Davis, I kept hearing the Muppet version of Scrooge, who, confronted by a plea for charity for orphans said: “What? Are there no prisons? Are there no workhouses?”
When I staffed the Senate, we prided ourselves on having people who knew a lot more than any reporter in town or any news organization with all its resources. When I staffed the Utah legislature, the members made sure they knew their stuff before they called for change, generally. Olberman, Stewart and Colbert sometimes appear to have corraled all the smart people outside of the White House. But what in the hell is Davis’s excuse?
Update: Welcome, visitors of July 2. Obviously, you’re linking from somewhere else — but my systems have not picked it up. Where are you coming from? Somebody tell, in comments, please.
Clean energy bill needs your help
June 25, 2009Call your Congressman, the person who represents you in the U.S. House of Representatives, and urge a “yea” vote on the comprehensive clean energy bill.
You can check your representative at several places, or follow the instructions through RePower America, listed below the video from our old friend Al Gore.
Repower America said in an e-mail:
Clean energy bill needs our support
Any moment now, the House will be voting on the boldest attempt to rethink how we produce and use energy in this country. The bill’s passage is not assured. Call your Representative today.
- Call 877-9-REPOWER (877-9-737-6937) and we’ll connect you to your Representative right after providing you with talking points. (We’re expecting high call volume, and if you are unable to be connected please use our secondary line, 866-590-0971.)
- When connected to your Representative’s office, just remember to tell them your name, that you’re a voter, and that you live in their district. Then ask them to “vote ‘yes’ on comprehensive clean energy legislation.”
They’d like you to report your contact, here.
What? You haven’t been following the debate? Here’s what the pro-pollution, give-all-your-money-to-Canada, Hugo Chavez, and the Saudis group hopes. Here’s where the anti-pollution, pro-frog and clean environment people say the proposed act is way too weak as it stands. Here’s the House Energy and Commerce Committee drafts and discussion of the bill. Consumer Reports analyzed the bill here (and said it can’t be passed into law fast enough despite its flaws).
Call now. Pass the word to your friends. Tell your children to call — their kids deserve better than the path we’re on now.
More information and discussion:
- David Corn writing at Mother Jones, says the Mick Jagger standard isn’t good enough (“You can’t always get what you want; but if you try, sometimes, you get what you need.”) And today, “When is a climate bill, not a climate bill.”
- Dallas Morning News notes Texans fight the bill, but note only job losses in oil and gas, without counting job gains in wind and solar
- Los Angeles Times covers the horse race, but they are from Henry Waxman’s backyard
- House Rules Committee Report on H. R. 2454, The American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (743 pages)
- Summary of House amendments proposed, from the House Rules Committee (accessed June 26, 2009)
Rick Perry’s education dilemma
June 25, 2009Betsy Oney teaches in Arlington, Texas. She’s a frontline soldier in the fight to educate our kids.
She also reads the newspapers and pays attention to what is going on at the highest levels in Texas government. From her view, she describes better than anyone else I’ve seen, the problem facing Texas Gov. Rick Perry right now, after the Texas State Senate rejected Perry’s nominee to head the State Board of Education, Don McLeroy.
Texas governor in a dilemma over education board pick
By BETSY ONEYSpecial to the Star-TelegramGov. Rick Perry is in something of a Catch-22.
It started two years ago when he appointed dentist Don McLeroy to chair the State Board of Education. McLeroy is described by his many supporters as a “good and decent man,” and of that we can be sure.
McLeroy’s appointment came after the 80th Legislature adjourned, so he had to be confirmed during this year’s session. The confirmation failed in the Senate.
McLeroy’s supporters blame that on the fact that he’s a Christian. Records show that this Senate, and the House Public Education Committee in a July 16 hearing, were concerned not that he’s Christian but that McLeroy politicized Texas children’s education and led the board and the Texas education system into the spotlight. And what Texans and Americans saw in that light was a fairly grotesque parade of a few people — a majority faction of the board led by McLeroy — who listened to ideology instead of experts and were intent on imposing an antiquated education system on Texas children.
From that same elected board, Perry now must decide on a new chairman who, like McLeroy, will serve without scrutiny until the next legislative session, in 2011.
Perry’s decision is his Catch-22.
He probably won’t consider a Democrat. That leaves nine Republican possibilities. Seven are the radical members responsible for politicizing children’s education. They voted in lock step on a range of issues that individually and collectively have been widely seen by educators and lawyers as anything from illegal to unconstitutional to damaging children. Nominating from that pool might yield a different management style than McLeroy offered, but the ideology, intent and backward direction would remain the same.
The two remaining Republicans are conservative, but not extremists. Both District 11’s Pat Hardy of Fort Worth and District 15’s Bob Craig of Lubbock are well-qualified and would lead Texas public education in the right direction. In contrast to the radical members, they would be responsive to the changing educational needs that the future demands as well as to the rich diversity of children in our population.
Although Hardy has been mentioned as a nominee by senators, she’s recommending Craig.
Craig, an attorney, is a logical choice. He’s served on the board since 2002 and before that served on the Lubbock school board for 14 years. Craig is a “good and decent man,” but in contrast to McLeroy, his voting record and conciliatory demeanor show him to be a rational, uniting public education supporter. He listens to educators and experts. He respects the opinions of others. He votes in the interest of all children.
It’s clear that Perry could not make a better choice than Bob Craig. The Catch-22 is that by appointing a nonextremist, Perry risks losing support from his biggest donors, the religious right.
These donors see benefit in turning public education into religious education at taxpayer expense. They see benefit in keeping critical thinking out of the classroom. Their money is essential in his campaign against Republican Kay Bailey Hutchison in the next gubernatorial primary election.
If Perry appoints from the pool of radical rights, the voting public will be alerted that he’s sacrificing our children’s education and Texas’ future for his own political interests. So he’ll lose votes.
Money and ideology vs. public’s interest and, ultimately, its confidence. What a dilemma! Stay tuned.
Betsy Oney of Fort Worth holds a master of education degree and is a master reading teacher (and English-as-a-second-language teacher) in the Arlington school district.
Maybe estimates of sea level increases are low; maybe climate change damage will be greater than expected
June 20, 2009Eternal Hope at Daily Kos wonders what happens if the conservative estimates of sea level rise — the ones you usually see cited in the press — turn out to be way too conservative. What happens if sea levels rise about double what some are estimating now?
If the severity and frequency of storms does not increase much, we may be able to accommodate the changes over time (though remember, some say we can do it easily).
How willing are the skeptics and denialists to tell cities and insurance actuaries that the fears of ocean-level increases are piffles?
Speaking of insurance: Texas has been hammered over the past 20 years by unseasonal and much more-severe-than-usual thunderstorms, ice storms, straightline winds, tornadoes and hurricanes. Home insurance rates skyrocketed. State regulators argue with insurance companies about whether rate increases are justified. Insurance companies cite claims for problems that did not exist earlier, and which may be blamed on climate change. (How much excess mold will occur due to warming?)
Sometimes the arguments erupt into lawsuits and regulatory action. One such argument drags on now, with up to a $1 billion in overcharges at stake. How much of the fight from the insurance companies comes from their fears of the effects of global warming?
Typewriter of the moment: Alistair Cooke for the BBC
June 19, 2009
Alistair Cooke's typewriter, displayed at BBC headquarters, Bush House, in London - Photo by Jeff Zycinski
Alas, our students now are too young to remember Alistair Cooke’s hosting of “Masterpiece Theater” on PBS, and of course, back then the BBC America service — if it existed — was available only to shortwave fanatics or people who traveled a lot to the British Isles.
Perhaps more than anyone else other than Winston Churchill, and maybe the Beatles, Alistair Cooke tied England and America together tightly in the 20th century. BBC’s other writers are good to brilliant, but even their obituary for Cooke (March 30, 2004) doesn’t quite do him justice:
For more than half a century, Alistair Cooke’s weekly broadcasts of Letter from America for BBC radio monitored the pulse of life in the United States and relayed its strengths and weaknesses to 50 countries.
His retirement from the show earlier this month after 58 years, due to ill health, brought a flood of tributes for his huge contributing to broadcasting.
Perhaps for Cooke, from Cooke’s broadcasts, we could develop a new variation of the Advanced Placement document-based question: Broadcast-based questions. Heaven knows his Letter From America provided profound material on American history:
- Cooke’s comments on the first U.S. manned orbital space flight, by John Glenn (later senator from Ohio) – February 1962
- Cooke’s account of the assassination of Robert F. Kennedy, which he witnessed – June 1968
- Cooke on Watergate and the resignation of President Richard M. Nixon – August 1974
- AP English? Cooke on Shaw’s observation that the US and the UK are “two nations divided by a common language” – a 1998 Letter on differences in language in the two nations

BBC's famous broadcaster Alistair Cooke, painted by June Mendoza (copyright Mendoza - http://www.junemendoza.co.uk)
Gambling to make government work, in Cave Creek, Arizona
June 17, 2009It helps that it happened in a small Arizona town, in the desert, with a colorful name. You cannot imagine such a thing happening in Yonkers, New York, nor in West Bend, Wisconsin.
A deadlocked election for the Cave Creek city council came down to a draw from a deck of cards, a poker deck carefully shuffled by a robed judge.

Cave Creek, Arizona, Judge George Preston, shuffles cards to breal a deadlock between Thomas McGuire, left, and Adam Trenk. New York Times photo by Joshua Trent
We get the story from The New York Times:
Adam Trenk and Thomas McGuire, both in blue jeans and open-collar shirts, strode nervously into Town Hall with their posses. There stood the town judge. He selected a deck of cards from a Stetson hat and shuffled it — having removed the jokers — six times.
Mr. McGuire, 64, a retired science teacher and two-term incumbent on the Town Council, selected a card, the six of hearts, drawing approving oos and aws from his supporters.
Mr. Trenk, 25, a law student and newcomer to town, stepped forward. He lifted a card — a king of hearts — and the crowd roared. Cave Creek had finally selected its newest Council member.
“It’s a hell of a way to win — or lose — an election,” Mr. McGuire said. Still, it was only fitting, Mr. McGuire and others here said, that a town of 5,000 that prides itself on, and sometimes fights over, preserving its horse trails, ranches and other emblems of the Old West would cut cards to decide things. A transplant of 10 years from Yorktown Heights, N.Y., north of New York City, Mr. McGuire said he knew things were different here when not long after arriving he walked into a bar and found a horse inside.
Marshall Trimble, a cowboy singer, folklorist and community college professor who serves as Arizona’s official historian, said, “We are pretty tied to our roots here, at least we like to think so.”
Hans Zinnser, in the venerable Rats, Lice and History, relates the story of an eastern European town where such ties are broken by lice — the two candidates put their beards on a table, and a louse is placed between the men. The man whose beard the louse chooses is the winner.
Of course, this makes it difficult for women to participate in government fully.
Cave Creek is a typical cowboy, American town. Deadlocks in government can be resolved by a game of chance.
Government teachers, history teachers, go get this story and clip it — it’s a good bell ringer, if not a full lesson in democratic republican government.
So, as the state’s Constitution allows, a game of chance was called to break the deadlock. The two candidates agreed on a card game (alternatives from the past have included rolling dice and, on rare occasions, gunfights).
Mr. Trimble said a cutting of the cards or roll of the dice had decided ties a handful of times in Arizona local elections. Tie-breakers have also been tried in other states, including in recent years in Alaska and Minnesota, said Paul Fidalgo, a spokesman for FairVote, a Washington group that monitors and advocates for fair elections.
Mr. Fidalgo said the group objected to random chance as the decider of election outcomes.
“Definitely not a democratic ideal, to say the least,” he said, suggesting, among other ideas, that the tied candidates engage in one more runoff.
That was ruled out here as too expensive, and besides, this was much more fun, as Mayor Vincent Francia made clear, clutching a microphone and serving as M.C.
“Originally we thought of settling this with a paintball fight but that involves skill, and skill is not allowed in this,” Mr. Francia said to laughter.
Did you ever think that the ability to shuffle a deck of cards would be a job skill for a judge? There’s a reason law students play poker in the coffee lounge, and all weekend!
There’s more. Go read the Times. This is also why the New York Times is a great paper, and why we cannot function without “mainstream media.” Who else could have brought us the story?
More resources:
- Story from KPHO Channel 5 News, in Phoenix, with link to a great video (how can you capture the video for classroom use?)
- AZ Central (Arizona Republic) story on the council meeting — approval of a 128,000 square-foot WalMart store was on the first agenda after the card shuffle decision
- Story from ABC affliate, Channel 15
- Politico report
- “Mathematics of a tied election,” from Cox News, 2000
- Lahood Productions’ 2004 election coverage — story of a deck of cards deciding an election in New Mexico in 1998
- Gateway to state election codes, from the National Center for State Courts
- Arizona election code; provision for breaking a tie by lot
President Obama on the necessity of science
June 16, 2009Many Americans took great pleasure in Barack Obama’s noting the importance of science, and the importance of heeding science, in his inaugural address.
In April he attended an annual meeting of the poobahs at the National Academy of Sciences, one of the world’s premiere science organizations and the backbone and guts of the science movement that drove American prosperity and security in the 20th century. Historians will want to note especially the history President Obama recounted in the first few minutes of the speech.
Can we use video for DBQs in AP courses yet? Here’s one to use.
Real racism: Should we brace for protests?
June 16, 2009Here’s a story exposing a real case of racism, “Latest Republican racist e-mail.” Hillbuzz? Texas Darlin’? Are you going to go after this despicable display? Are you going to defend a color-blind society and anti-racism?
No, we didn’t really think so. Now that we’ve established what you really do, we’re just haggling over the price.
Recycling = Patriotism
June 14, 2009Once upon a time it was a patriotic action to recycle things.

Boy Scouts distributed posters urging recycling during World War II - National Scouting Museum via National Archives
Once upon a time the nation’s future hinged on the ability of Americans to conserve resources and energy sources, especially gasoline. So Americans, from the president to the lowliest boy, united to urge Americans to recycle rubber, metal, rags and paper. It was the patriotic thing to do.
Did the recycling make significant contributions to the resources necessary to win the war? A few argue that the value of the campaigns was uniting people toward a common goal. But there were some clear connections between recycling of some products and the resources delivered to soldiers at the front that aided their fighting.
In the Pacific, Japan cut off U.S. access to rubber in Indochina. Rubber from South America and Africa could be intercepted in shipping by German u-boats. Metal refining from ores required more energy than refining from scrap. Although the U.S. entered the war as the world’s leading petroleum exporting nation, gasoline and Diesel fuel supplies were precious for airplanes, tanks and other machines directly supporting the troops.
Recycling was patriotic in every possible meaning of the word.
Is it really a news flash? Recycling is still the patriotic thing to do.
What the hell? They’re pro-garbage? Who in the world pays for this campaign Milloy runs, Vladimir Putin? Vlad the Impaler?
Digg: http://digg.com/d1toaH
Posted by Ed Darrell 




















