Laden’s late; but, is Yellowstone gonna blow AND TAKE US WITH IT?

The veteran reader of this blog — can there be more than one? — may recall the kerfuffle a couple of years ago when there was a “swarm” of earthquakes in the Yellowstone.  Alas for those prone to panic attacks, the swarm ran through the Hanukkah/Ramadan/Christmas/KWANZAA/New Year’s holidays, when other news is slack.

Yellowstone Caldera, Smith and Siegel 2000

What the Yellowstone Caldera might look like from space, by moonlight, on a clear night, if you can imagine the borders of Yellowstone National Park very vividly – Smith and Siegel, 2000

You might understand, then, why I say Greg Laden turns his considerable story-telling prowess to the issue late.  Still, his prowess towers over the rest of us, and he tells a great story.

Is the Yellowstone safe? he asks, rhetorically.

The answer is complex:

1) Wear a seat belt when driving around in the region;

2) Don’t feed the bears and make sure you understand bear safety; and

3) Somebody is going to get blasted by some kind of volcano in the area some day, but even if you live there the chances are it won’t be you.

The joy is in the journey — go read Laden’s explanation of the rising lava.  Heck, even those of us who think we know that stuff understand it better when he explains it.

Earlier in the Bathtub:

Also see:

2 Responses to Laden’s late; but, is Yellowstone gonna blow AND TAKE US WITH IT?

  1. Ed Darrell says:

    Regret I missed your earlier posts, Greg — I’ll go look for them.

    Well aware of the nature of the caldera, I admit to some trepidation during my last two tours of Yellowstone, enough that I actually checked the USGS to see about recent seismic activity.

    But on the whole, I think it’s a tragedy that fewer than 4 million Americans a year see Yellowstone. It’s a trip every person should make in a lifetime at least. While I don’t want the park any more crowded, I pray for the enlightenment to things that most people get when they visit.

    Thanks for dropping by, Greg.


  2. Greg Laden says:

    Thanks for the link.

    I’m actually not late, though. (I had covered the issue back during the swarm in an exceptionally timely manner.) This latest post is VERY current (more or less) because of the December publication of the study of that swarm (academics moves so much more slowly than the blogosphere) plus 48 hours ago there were a couple of tremors felt in the area that people took notice of (though I don’t mention them, it kinda reminded me of the December paper).

    I think this is a wonderful issue because it combines all the interesting elements of Earth Science, History, Danger, Nature and Conspiracy Theory (in which the Conspiracy theorists have point!)

    I don’t say it outright in the post, but it does seem that the post-swarm research actually makes the caldera look more likely to be a bit of a problem than less likely over the coming centuries or thousands of years. What a dumb place to put a park!


Please play nice in the Bathtub -- splash no soap in anyone's eyes. While your e-mail will not show with comments, note that it is our policy not to allow false e-mail addresses. Comments with non-working e-mail addresses may be deleted.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: