Happy 225th birthday, Millard Fillmore!

January 7, 2025

Millard Fillmore, bronzed, sitting at the corner of 9th and St. Joseph Streets in Rapid City, South Dakota. He still gets around. Photo by Ed Darrell. Please use.

Millard Fillmore, bronzed, sitting at the corner of 9th and St. Joseph Streets in Rapid City, South Dakota. He still gets around. Photo by Ed Darrell. Please use. Creative Commons copyright.

Millard Fillmore, our 13th President, was born on January 7, 1800.

That was 24 days after the death of our first President, George Washington.

Fillmore’s birthday isn’t such a big deal anymore, since fun organizers discontinued the bathtub races once word got out that the story of Millard Fillmore putting the first bathtub in the White House, is a hoax.

Historians from the University of Buffalo — an institution founded by Fillmore after his presidency — usually hold a graveside ceremony with speeches. In 2025, the celebration has been postponed to Sunday, January 12, due to weather.

It’s a shame, really. Fillmore is the victim of fake news, a hoax perpetrated by H. L. Mencken 108 years ago, in 1917. Mencken claimed, falsely, that Fillmore’s sole good, memorable deed was putting that fictitious bathtub in the White House. That story crowds out the real history, and any good Fillmore should be remembered for.

Fillmore did a few notable things as president.

  • Fillmore secured a steady supply of bird guano for the United States. Funny as that may be, the guano was essential for making gun powder, which in turn helped fuel the military might of the United States for years (including through the Civil War).
  • Millard Fillmore and his first wife, Abigail, read books all the time. Deprived of the opportunity of going to school much in his youth, Fillmore became an ardent reader, read for the law, became a lawyer, got into politics and was selected Vice President for President Zachary Taylor. When Taylor died (probably of typhoid) in 1850, Fillmore succeeded to the presidency. In the White House, the Fillmores found few books to read, and so established the White House Library. Say prayers that library survives the current president.
  • Fillmore thought globally, and he could see world trade as a huge opportunity for a young nation with a strong navy and army, and a lot of resources including intellectual capacity to manufacture things. Trade in the Pacific was problematic, and a large number of problems stemmed from Japan’s closing itself off from the world. Japan had coal, which could refuel steamships. Japan instead closed its ports. An occasional U.S. sailor would be executed if he washed up on Japanese shores. Fillmore sent a small fleet of “black ships” under Commodore Matthew Perry, to tell Japan it was time to open up to trade and assume its place among nations. Perry was successful, after a second visit and a small round of cannon fire. Japan became a strong economic power in the West Pacific, and in its march to glory decided to take over resources of several other Asian nations. We might say Fillmore started the slide to World War II in the Pacific.

History should be kept to accuracy. Mencken upset the ship of accuracy with his essay, and America has not recovered, nor has Millard Fillmore’s reputation. There’s a moral there: Don’t spread hoaxes; seek the truth, and glorify it. (Mencken apologized for the hoax, but too late.)

Rapid City, South Dakota, is a booming town. Mineral wealth and oil in the state combine with a nearby Air Force Base, great housing prices and good weather to benefit the town. One of its civic watchdogs got the idea of putting statues of all U.S. presidents on downtown corners. That is how Millard Fillmore comes to be seated with a book to read, at the corner of 9th Street and St. Joseph Street, where I met him in August 2017. Altogether a fun little history enterprise for Rapid City, very well executed, and worthy of a stop there if you’re passing by.

Perhaps someday Rapid City will take to decorating the statues on the birthdays of the men (so far!) represented. I hope they won’t be frozen out like Buffalo, New York, is, if they commemorate Millard Fillmore’s birthday.

We can reflect on happier times, when even our disrespected and forgotten presidents were good people who did great things.

Millard Fillmore and Ed Darrell meet, in Rapid City, South Dakota, August 2017

Millard Fillmore and Ed Darrell meet, in Rapid City, South Dakota, August 2017; photo by Kathryn Knowles

More:

 


Flying U.S. flags in January 2025

January 3, 2025

“Raising the first American flag, Somerville, Mass., January 1, 1776.” Harper’s Weekly painting by Clyde Osmer DeLand, 1897. From the digital collections of the New York Public Library; yes, MFB has used this painting before. I like it.

One problem with January’s flag flying dates is that if I snooze a little, you miss a lot. There are four flag-flying dates in the first five days of January: New Year’s Day and statehood days for Georgia, Alaska and Utah. You, Dear Reader, are alert and didn’t let any of those dates pass unmarked if you’re in those states, right?

There are more dates to go in January, including New Mexico’s statehood. We’re not halfway done, yet.

President Joe Biden declared flags should fly at half-staff in honor of the late President Jimmy Carter, for 30 days, until January 28. That covers all the dates in the usual flag-flying calendar. When flying flags at half staff, the flag should be hoisted quickly to full staff, then lowered soberly (slowly) to half staff.

In January 2025, the U.S. Flag Code urges citizens to fly flags on these dates, listed chronologically:

  • New Year’s Day, January 1, a federal holiday
  • January 2, Georgia Statehood Day
  • January 3, Alaska Statehood Day
  • January 4, Utah Statehood Day
  • January 6, New Mexico Statehood Day
  • January 9, Connecticut Statehood Day
  • Martin Luther King’s Birthday, a federal holiday on the third Monday of January; that date is January 19, in 2025; King’s actual birthday is January 15, and you may fly your flag then, too
  • Inauguration Day, January 20, the year after election years; 2025 will see an inauguration
  • January 26, Michigan Statehood Day
  • January 29, Kansas Statehood Day

You may fly your flag any other day you wish, too; flags should not be flown after sundown unless they are specially lighted, or at one of the few places designated by Congress or Presidential Proclamation for 24-hour flag flying.  According to Wikipedia’s listing, those sites include:

  • Fort McHenry, Baltimore, Maryland (Presidential Proclamation No. 2795, July 2, 1948).
  • Flag House Square, Albemarle and Pratt Streets, Baltimore, Maryland (Public Law 83-319, approved March 26, 1954).
  • Marine Corps War Memorial (Iwo Jima Memorial), Arlington, Virginia (Presidential Proclamation No. 3418, June 12, 1961).
  • Lexington Battle Green, Lexington, Massachusetts (Public Law 89-335, approved November 8, 1965).
  • White House, Washington, D.C. (Presidential Proclamation No. 4000, September 4, 1970).
  • Washington Monument, Washington, D.C. (Presidential Proclamation No. 4064, July 6, 1971, effective July 4, 1971).
  • Any port of entry to the United States which is continuously open (Presidential Proclamation No. 413 1, May 5, 1972).
  • Grounds of the National Memorial Arch in Valley Forge State Park, Valley Forge, Pennsylvania (Public Law 94-53, approved July 4, 1975).
Flag House in 1936, 844 East Pratt & Albemarle Streets (Baltimore, Independent City, Maryland) (cropped). Image courtesy of the federal HABS—Historic American Buildings Survey of Maryland.

Flag House in 1936, where Mary Pickersgill sewed the garrison-sized, 15-star flag that flew over Fort McHenry at the Battle of Baltimore in 1814; one of the sites where the U.S. flag may be flown 24 hours. The house is at 844 East Pratt & Albemarle Streets (Baltimore, Independent City, Maryland). Cropped image courtesy of the federal HABS—Historic American Buildings Survey of Maryland.

Save

Children unfurl a large flag at a Denver Nuggets/Indiana Pacers NBA basketball game in Denver, January 2016. Colorado Public Radio image.
This is an encore post.
Yes, this is an encore post. Defeating ignorance takes patience and perseverance.

The Economic Case for Democrats over Republicans

July 25, 2024

A woman going by the handle Kashoggi’s Ghost (@UROCKLive1) on Twitter (X, if you must), lays out in necessary detail the economic case for Democrats over Republicans, in the race for President, and in all races for Congress.

It’s long. Here’s the text from all 24 Tweets in the thread (more may be added later). Bottom line, Democrats in the White House will make America greater and better, while Republican policies will again crash the economy.



Listen up, you guys, we’ve got a democracy to save! And neither the courts nor the media is going to help us. Buckle up for a long thread.🧵

1) Right now we’ve got a third of the country who believe Trump’s lies, a third who see what’s happening and will vote for Biden, even if they’re not fond of him, and a third who are completely clueless. The third group are the people we need to reach.

Sadly, I can’t go out in the world and be around people, so I won’t have the opportunity to talk to folks and tell them what they don’t know, but I’ve got talking points for y’all.

2) First, the economy seems to be what folks are fixated on, but they have their facts wrong, so let’s start there.

To sell this economy, you need to start in 2020. People prefer not to remember that time. Remind them. Besides refrigerated morgues, empty shelves, overrun hospitals and people dying, businesses and schools were closed, unemployment went way up, and we had GLOBAL inflation from the GLOBAL pandemic. Please make sure people understand this. Inflation started all over the world before the president took office, in large part due to messed up supply chains caused by the pandemic. (Not to mention corporate greed, but that’s another story.)

3) Biden came into an economic mess, and all the financial pundits were predicting a recession for at least the first two years he was in office. So the president focused on getting the country up and running again, first by making vaccines available to everyone, then by passing the Inflation Reduction Act, which was also the most substantial climate change initiative in history. But that took almost two years to get passed and then signed into law, and then it takes time for it to be implemented and then more time for the effects to be felt. We are only just barely beginning to feel the real results of that.

4) Now we have an economy that’s the envy of the world. Our inflation is more under control than that of our allies. Unemployment is at 50 year lows, the stock market is at all time highs. The president pulled off an freaking economic miracle and doesn’t get nearly enough credit for it.

But the average person has amnesia about the pandemic and is still mad because groceries cost more, something the president has no control over. The fact is, prices are never going to go back to 2019 levels, no matter who is president, because that’s not how anything works. Over time prices go up, sometimes faster than others. These prices are the new normal.

So we need to explain to literally anyone who will listen that the pandemic caused global economic upset, and that the US has handled it better than any other country. And Trump is now threatening to undo everything Biden did if he’s reelected, and the business community is practically yelling that Trump’s proposed new agenda will be an economic disaster, and cause major inflation.

5) If we were to reelect Trump, (we won’t) but if we did the economy would keep humming for a couple of years because it would take him time to wreck it, and you can bet that he’d be taking credit for everything Biden accomplished.

But, again, we’re only just barely beginning to feel the effects of Biden’s policies, and we’re still the envy of the world. It’s only going to get better from here. WHY ON EARTH WOULD WE WANT TO REVERSE COURSE NOW?!

6) For people to fully appreciate the economic miracle that is the US they need to remember what was happening when Biden came into office, and stop comparing today to 2019. We’re never going back there. And I think to a certain extent the general sense of malaise and depression many experienced after the pandemic (which is still going on, btw) is affecting their attitudes about how good things are now.

So please go out and remind people where we really were four years ago and how historically amazing our current economy is.

7) Once you’ve got folks appreciating what Biden has done, please start dispelling the myth that GOP policies are better for the eonomy. That hasn’t been true in my lifetime. But I have a theory on why it persists, and that’s because people associate the current economy with whoever is in the White House, without taking into consideration that it takes time for policies to be enacted, and then more time for them to take effect.

So look at the pattern over the last 40 years. Reagan did what every Republican administration has done ever since: gave huge tax cuts to billionaires and big corporations, gutting federal revenues, and creating a ripple effect that starts slow and gains momentum over a period of years. A smart country would prioritize education, FOR EVERYONE, but instead we keep cutting funding to make up for those juicy corporate tax cuts.

8) Triple down economics has never worked. Not once. Not even a little, but every single Republican administration tries it again.

9) So look at the pattern. The economy was already in trouble when Bush 41 took over in 1989. What he did was too little too late, and he lost his job for it. Clinton took over an economic mess, and by the time he left the economy was humming. Dubya came in in 2001, and they did the whole tax cuts for billionaires thing again and before the end of his second term we were in a recession. BECAUSE TRICKLE DOWN ECONOMICS DOESN’T WORK.

So then Obama came into power when things were really bad, unemployment was high, businesses were failing. But after 8 years of Dem policies the economy was cooking again.

Trump came in and took credit for Obama’s economy, and then went right back to tax cuts for billionaires and corporations. He claimed he created the greatest economy, but he created nothing. He just took credit for it. There were already signs that there was going to be another recession in Trump’s second term before the pandemic hit.

And no, the pandemic wasn’t his fault, but the absolutely atrocious way he handled it was. But things would not have turned out that rosy even minus the pandemic effects. We were headed in the wrong direction.

10) But Biden won, and instead of the Trump recession we got the Biden rebound. And now we have the best economy in the world, and we’re only just beginning to feel the effects from it. It would be insane and destructive to reverse course now. But that’s exactly what Trump would do. He would cancel everything Biden has done, and take credit for the results of what he couldn’t cancel. It would be a huge mistake.

11) Another myth about Republicans being better for the economy is that they want to bring down spending and cut the deficit, but in fact, when they’re in power they do the exact opposite. It’s been this way for years. Whenever Dems are in power the GOP screams about the deficit, but whenever they’re in power they make it so much worse. They cut spending just a little by hurting the poor and middle class, and they give massive tax cuts to billionaires and corporation which kills our revenue.

Biden’s record is much better on this than Trump’s. Also tell people that they want to defund the IRS so it doesn’t go after rich tax cheats, (to please their rich donors) and that this will actually cost us billions. The money we save by not fully funding the IRS is miniscule compared to the money we lose. And they know this, but they act like they’re doing it to be fiscally responsible.

Tell people this.

12) If we really want a spectacular economy, we need to keep Dems in office for more than 8 years. And to do that we need people to start understanding that to know where to place blame or give credit to for the economy, you need to look back four to six years. The economy doesn’t change because an election happened. The economy changes because of the policies enacted. If people could understand that, anyone voting based on the economy would keep voting for Dems.

13) Once you’ve dispelled the myth that Republicans are better for the economy, start reminding people of all the other reasons to vote. The court is HUGE. People ignored the importance of SCOTUS in 2016, and look where that got us. It’s not only women’s right to control their own bodies, this court is doing major damage in other ways. They’re dismantling the administrative state, and taking away the government’s right to protect us. This is another whole thread, and I should probably wait until we see the rest of their rulings.

BUT PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT PEOPLE KNOW THAT WOMEN LOSING THEIR RIGHTS IS BECAUSE OF DONALD TRUMP AND HIS COURT. Getting rid of Roe is one of the only promises he ever kept. But apparently there are people with so little understanding of how government works they think this must be Biden’s fault because he was president when it happens.

And some blame Dems for not codifying Roe without understanding that unless we have 60 votes in the senate, THIS CANNOT HAPPEN. Unless Dems control the senate with at least 60 votes, or eliminate the filibuster, (which I support, but it does have a downside) there is no way to codify Roe. This means women in red states are going to suffer.

14) Another GOP scam has been convincing people deregulation is a good thing. In actuality, deregulation means polluted air and water, no safety protections for workers, (or passengers in the case of the airlines) no financial protection for consumers, and no ability to slow down climate change. Deregulation is not our friend, but corporations love it. It saves them money, which they immediately use to benefit shareholders while the rest of us get screwed over. This court wants to eliminate the protections from regulations.

15) This Extreme Court and the Republicans also want to make abortion illegal nationwide, (listen up, blue-staters!) and eliminate access to birth control. THEY HAVE EVERY INTENTION OF DOING THIS. If we elect another Republican, ANY REPUBLICAN, they’re going to appoint justices who will take away protections for birth control, and LBGTQ people will no longer be protected either. Not only could they lose the right to marry, (which is more important for legal reasons than a lot of younger people realize) they could even criminalize gay sex, just like the good old days.

All of this along with this court’s support for gutting voting rights, allowing gerrymandering, etc. will make it a lot harder to fix any of this. Even if you don’t like Biden, whoever gets to appoint the next justices will have an enormous effect on this country for at least a generation. We really REALLY need a Democrat in the White House AND a Democratic controlled senate, or we will suffer for a long time. Probably the rest of my lifetime.

16) We need to elect Dems in the House, the Senate, and the presidency, both for the economy, and because if Republicans take control again, the whole country is going to end up like the red states. Women will lose their rights, and the whole country will suffer from red state folly. You’ll notice that the red states have the worst economies, too, and the worst education systems, and the worst healthcare. Why anyone would want Republicans to control the whole country is beyond me, because their record is terrible.

17) So please try to explain all of this to everyone around you, and everyone you meet. Find out about the Dems running in your districts, (statewide offices, too) find out good things about them, and sing their praises to people around you. Get folks to understand the consequences of electing Republicans.

Ask people questions that start with, “Did you know …”

“Did you know that Joe Biden and the Democrats passed the largest and most historic climate change legislation in history?”

“Did you know that Republican controlled states have the worst education, the worst economy, and the worst healthcare in the US?”

“Did you know that we always have a recession toward the end of every eight year Republican term?”

18) Help people compare the results from which party is in power.

The recent congresses give you plenty of examples. Obama gave us healthcare, and the GOP (including Trump) have been trying to take it away ever since. In Trump’s first two years he had a Republican Congress and Senate, and really the only thing they accomplished was the usual tax cuts for billionaires thing. He built a couple of miles of wall (which is a stupid idea anyway and this wall is already falling down,) and he came within one vote of taking away healthcare WITH NOTHING TO REPLACE IT WITH. (Thank you, John McCain.) Other than that, they did nothing for the American people. Then we had divided government which means very little gets done.

19) In Biden’s first two years with a Dem Congress they passed the Inflation Reduction Act into law, the most comprehensive climate legislation the U.S. has even seen. The law invests hundreds of billions of dollars in clean energy, electric vehicles, environmental justice and more.

The Inflation Reduction Act represents the largest attempt in U.S. history to combat climate change. It includes clean-energy funding covering cars and homes and businesses, while curbing methane emissions, and it sets aside money for communities heavily affected by air pollution, flooding, and other climate-related issues.

This legislation also includes new measures to lower prescription drug costs, including a provision empowering Medicare to negotiate prices with the pharmaceutical industry, a new $2,000 yearly cap on out-of-pocket costs for prescriptions through Medicare, and a $35 monthly insulin cap for Medicare beneficiaries.

They also strengthened our supply chains and set up new programs to support minority businesses, and expanded STEM education opportunities so that more women and minorities can get the skills needed to succeed in a high-tech economy. Plus they gave additional funding to the IRS which raises our revenue.

And passing the Inflation Reduction Act was just the beginning. In the year and a half since its enactment, the administration has focused on developing tax credit guidance and launching programs to implement its many clean energy provisions

The Dem Congress also passed The Electoral Count Reform Act, to try to prevent someone like Trump from trying to steal an election again.

For the two years of a Dem Congress under President Biden, they worked hard to do things that would actually help the American people.

20) And what has this Republican Congress done? Mostly a whole lot of nothing. They spent weeks trying to elect a Speaker, and then did that again a few months later. They impeached the Homeland Security Director, investigated Hunter Biden, tried as hard as they could to find a crime they could impeach the president for in spite of having no evidence for it, and they passed a bunch of performative nonsense bills that would accomplish nothing and that they knew had literally zero chance of becoming law, like protecting gas stoves, and naming airports and waterways after the disgraced, twice-impeached, convicted felon they all worship.

They were only barely able to pass a budget, and then the majority of Republicans voted against it. But not once, during this whole time have they even attempted to do anything that actually improves the lives of Americans.

Do we want more of this? Or do we want another congress working for us? If Dems control the House and senate, they will work to make our lives better. And contrary to what the silly owner of this website says, having a divided government doesn’t benefit anybody. It just stops all progress.

21) Then there’s Project 2025, which fortunately people are starting to hear about. It’s the blueprint for a fascist takeover. Please tell people about what they intend to do, and explain the damage that would cause. Do you really want a whole country being run by people who put loyalty to Trump over loyalty to the country? Especially knowing Trump will do everything in his power to remain in office to keep himself legally protected. Project 2025’s goals include eliminating access to birth control, eliminating women’s access to a divorce even if they’re suffering from abuse, gutting public education and giving the money to private Christian schools, and giving the president unlimited power. Encourage people to find out about it, because it’s hella scary.

22) If you meet anyone who still believes climate change is a hoax, they may very well be too stupid to reach, but most people know better. Ask people, “Did you know that Joe Biden and the Democrats passed the largest, most historic climate change initiative ever? They’re getting us ready for a clean energy future, and doing it in a way that benefits the economy too. 300,000 new jobs have already been created by this plan, and more to come. Trump and the GOP want to reverse all of it, and give more subsidies to the oil industry.” If you care about climate change at all, you need to vote for Dems, up and down the ticket, because nthe GOP only cares about Big Oil and big donors. They’re even trying to pass laws in some states making it illegal to try to slow down climate change. Republicans are a huge threat to the environment, the planet and our future.

23) Then ask folks if they care about the US’s role in the world. We’re still considered the leader of the free world, even though we’ve done plenty to damage that, but we will lose that if Trump is reelected. Our allies will forgive us for the mistake of electing him once, but if we do it a second time, they will never trust us again. They’re already getting hesitant to share intelligence with us, because they know it isn’t safe if Trump comes back. They will stop altogether if he does, and our whole country will be less safe.

Make sure to dispel the myth that the world doesn’t respect Biden and wants Trump back. The only country leaders who prefer Trump are our enemies, the evil dictators who rule Russia and North Korea. (Also Netanyahu, because although Israel is our ally, Bibi is not, for his own selfish reasons.) But do we really want to elect a president our allies dread and don’t trust and the evil dictators who want to destroy America would rejoice at? The Europeans don’t agree with every detail of how Biden has handled foreign policy, (neither do I) but we all know Trump would be infinitely worse.

I have another whole thread I need to write about NATO, which I’ll add here later, but please make sure folks understand how important NATO is to US and world security. Trump’s threat to pull is out is INSANE, and will make us very much less safe. America First means America alone. NATO is the greatest peacekeeping alliance in recorded history, and leaving them would be extremely dangerous to our national security, not to mention idiotic.

And as far as how the world sees us, how do you think they’ll feel if we elect a convicted felon to be the leader of our country? A criminal whose business organization owes more than a half a billion dollars for fraud convictions? Someone who can’t be trusted with intelligence, and who will sell our foreign policy off to the highest bidder in order to enrich himself. Seriously, it’s downright embarrassing.

24) Make sure the low info people you talk to realize that the vast majority of people in Trump’s cabinet (you know, the ones who saw how he actually ran the country) and his Vice President are now refusing to support him, and are saying he’s unfit for the job. This is unheard of in modern history. The people who agreed with Trump’s policies, but saw how he handled being the president are WARNING US NOT TO PUT HIM IN POWER AGAIN. How insane would it be not to listen to them?

I heard today that people actually trust Trump more than Biden to protect democracy. This is nuts. The only reason I can think of for this is that they believe the lies that the president is prosecuting his political rival, something Trump really wanted to do but was held back by the DOJ insisting that there had to be evidence of crimes for them to do this. (Barr tried to find such evidence, but wouldn’t prosecute without it.) Trump won’t be held back by this if he gets another chance.

So if you meet people who believe Biden is unfairly going after Trump for political reasons, tell them this: Merrick Garland stated under oath that he only took the job of Attorney General under the condition that it would be free from political pressure, and that since taking office the White House has never contacted or pressured him about any case. Not about Trump. Not about Hunter. He’s following the facts and the law, and none of this has anything to do with the president. Seriously, if he were directing DOJ, would he allow them to criminally prosecute his own son? Especially for a ridiculous offense that no one is ever prosecuted for.

So I’m not done, but I’m going to stop for now because I have things to do and my keyboard has lost its charge. I’ll keep adding to this thread. In the meanwhile, PLEASE, go out and proselytize to every one you meet. Tell all the people not paying attention what the stakes are, and fill them in on all the things they don’t know.

We need to share two stories: 1) the one about the overlooked miracle of Biden’s economic recovery, and all the good policies he managed to enact even with the very slimmest of majorities, and 2) the absolute disaster another Trump term would be. What Trump will do to our country if given the chance, will not be easy to fix if it’s even possible. And fixing it will take decades. For the climate, decades is too late, and for the social and economic policies, those decades will be miserable. Putting Republicans in power will take us backwards.

Really try to get folks to grasp the concept that the economy doesn’t magically and immediately change depending on who is president. It changes due to policies that are enacted, and those take time. They take time to pass, and they take time to implement, and then they take time before we feel their effects. We are only beginning to feel the benefits of what Biden and the Dems have done.

If you want to know who to blame or give credit to for the economy, look back four to six years and see who was doing what. This is why we have a recession at the end of every eight year Republican presidential term. They inherit a great economy from Dems, wreck it, and then Dems have to fix it. Please help people understand the timing thing, because the first four years of a Democratic president’s term the economy always sucks because that’s what they inherited. Then by the end of the second term after Dem policies have had a chance to work, the economy is doing great. Then Republicans win and reap the benefits and people think, “oh yeah, these are good times and a Republican is in the White House, so they must be better for the economy. This isn’t that hard to understand if you can get people to stop and think about it.

• • •


Lasting effects of powerful testimony often reach beyond the immediate result? Time’s cover

October 5, 2018

Time Magazine cover, October 14, 2018, featuring an image of Dr. Christine Blase Ford composed of words from her testimony to the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee. Cover by Jon Mavroudis.

Time Magazine cover, October 14, 2018, featuring an image of Dr. Christine Blase Ford composed of words from her testimony to the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee. Cover by Jon Mavroudis.

Cover art used to be absolutely necessary to sell magazines at the newsstand.

But who buys anything at a newsstand today?

The surge in great cover art over the past decade pleases me partly because it’s almost pointless, in the old sense. Great covers rarely increase circulation of print publications any more.

So why the surge?

A memorable cover still builds the reputation of a publication, and art is useful online, too.

Time Magazine is a skinny version of its old self, these days, no longer the foundation of the powerful Time/Life/Fortune/Money empire built by Henry Luce. Heck, are those four magazines even owned by the same company any more, even apart from Life having ceased publication decades ago?

The covers continue, and occasionally them come in an animated form. They still set expectations for news, and provide a visual shorthand for material on the inside, material the publishers hope we’ll read.

What is Time trying to tell us this week, with Dr. Christine Blasey Ford on the cover? (Look at this animated version; wish I could figure out how to embed it short of the Tweet.)

 

https://twitter.com/ZenPopArt/status/1047859739676139521

Perhaps more important, how will this cover, this moment in time captured there, affect politics in the future, say on November 6, or in 2020? Has the testimony of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford pushed America in any different direction on any issue?

Check out the article at Time, “How Christine Blasey Ford’s Testimony Changed America,” by Haley Sweetland Edwards.

More:

Please help fight ignorance, and share this post on your Twitter, Facebook, Reddit or other social media accounts. Thank you.

 


How to tell some troll is pulling your virtual leg

April 13, 2018

The fin de siècle newspaper proprietor / F. Opper. Library of Congress

The fin de siècle newspaper proprietor / F. Opper, 1894, Puck. Summary: Print shows a newspaper owner, possibly meant to be Joseph Pulitzer, sitting in a chair in his office next to an open safe where “Profits” are spilling out onto the floor; outside this scene are many newspaper reporters for the “Daily Splurge” rushing to the office to toss their stories onto the printing press, such stories as “A Week as a Tramp!! Wild and Exciting Experiences of a Daily Splurge Reporter”, “A Reporter of the Daily Splurge Spends a Thrilling Week in an Asylum!”, “An Organ Grinder’s Life”, “Life in Sing Sing – a Splurge Reporter in Disguise”, “Divorce Court Details”, “Private Scandal”, “a Night Around Town” by a woman reporter “in Men’s Attire”, life on the streets “As a Flower Girl”, “Thrilling Exposé”, “How beggars are treated on 5th Ave. by Fanny Fake”, and “High Spiced Sensation”. A notice hanging on the wall of the office states “The Motto of the Daily Splurge – Morality and a High Sense of Duty.” Library of Congress image

You’ve been watching news on TV all your life (you should have been reading your local daily newspaper, too . . . but I digress), and you hate to admit you’re having a tough time telling when Trump lies to you, or someone lies about Trump.

There is help available, for thinking people.

EdTechAdvocate features technology the editors consider useful for teachers and students in schools.

Occasionally school overlaps with real life.

Here are eight apps the publication recommends for teachers and students, to help them use their critical faculties to determine what news is accurate, and what news isn’t. From an article by Micheal Lynch.

No reason we shouldn’t use these tools for everyone, even people out of school for decades.

The recommendations, and links to the eight tools:

As fake news, biased media, and internet hoaxes abound, students need to be taught digital literacy from the time they start using computers. Fortunately, there are resources available for students to check their facts.

  1. All Sides

This site provides balanced news from all perspectives, so students can sort through facts and distinguish between differences in opinions easily. The site also offers a specialized search option where you filter results. Additionally, it offers a school toolbox with a variety of useful resources and lesson plans.

  1. CRAAP Test

Teaching students how to evaluate websites and information is a necessary skill. The CRAAP Test designed by Meriam Library, California State University, Chico is helpful in guiding students through evaluating the currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose of information.

  1. FactCheck

This website is a non-profit, nonpartisan site which is a Project of The Annenberg Public Policy Center allows students to ask questions and search. Additionally, it also allows students to ask science questions on public policy issues.

  1. Hoax-Slayer

This website focuses on debunking hoaxes or urban legends, as well as email hoaxes and internet scams. It also provides information on how to protect your email and computer.

  1. Politifact

Using a Truth-O-Meter (true, mostly true, mostly false, and false), Politifact rates the accuracy of claims. It focuses on politicians.

  1. Snopes

One of the original fact-checking websites, Snopes is a popular site for identifying misinformation and debunking internet rumors. Students can search with keywords or by plugging in a URL.

  1. Ted ED – “How to Choose Your News”

The Ted-Ed video, “How to Choose Your News” by Dan Brown is designed for students. Using imagery and explanations they will understand, Dan Brown explains how to be a critical thinker and savvy evaluator when it comes to reading (or watching) the news.

  1. Truth or Fiction

Another website that focuses on debunking internet rumors, e-mail hoaxes, and questionable images where students can search information as well.

Teachers need to explain how media biases work and change facts to fit their needs. By teaching students to use fact checking tools, teachers are strengthening their digital literacy skills.

Detail from

Detail from “Fin de seicle newspaper proprietor,” by F. Opper, 1894, Puck Magazine. Library of Congress image via Wikipedia

What are your favorite sources of solid information, and what are your methods of determining who is pulling your leg, and who is not? 


Carl Sagan’s “foreboding” of a dumb America; too late to stop it?

August 9, 2017

NASA photo of Dr. Carl Sagan with a model of the Mars Viking Lander, in Death Valley, California. Or was it taken on Mars? How could we tell, if we lacked sharpened and practiced critical thinking practices?

NASA photo of Dr. Carl Sagan with a model of the Mars Viking Lander, in Death Valley, California. Or was it taken on Mars? How could we tell, if we lacked sharpened and practiced critical thinking practices?

Are we already too late?

In The Demon-Haunted World in 1995, astronomer and thinker Carl Sagan worried about the directions America was heading, intellectually, and what it could mean for the future. He wrote:

Science is more than a body of knowledge; it is a way of thinking. I have a foreboding of an America in my children’s or grandchildren’s time—when the United States is a service and information economy; when nearly all the key manufacturing industries have slipped away to other countries; when awesome technological powers are in the hands of a very few, and no one representing the public interest can even grasp the issues; when the people have lost the ability to set their own agendas or knowledgeably question those in authority; when, clutching our crystals and nervously consulting our horoscopes, our critical faculties in decline, unable to distinguish between what feels good and what’s true, we slide, almost without noticing, back into superstition and darkness. The dumbing down of America is most evident in the slow decay of substantive content in the enormously influential media, the 30-second sound bites (now down to 10 seconds or less), lowest common denominator programming, credulous presentations on pseudoscience and superstition, but especially a kind of celebration of ignorance.

Sagan had hope. His book’s full title is The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a candle in the dark.

Should we hold that hope today? Elections in 2016 demonstrated that false news does sway the electorate, superstition can overcome knowledge. Worse, too many Americans cannot tell the difference. In a time when millions of Americans profess to work to find “the way,” we confront those same people wandering aimlessly through American culture, apparently with little clue as to how far off the path of reality they are, or any real understanding of what “the way” would even look like. Their compasses operate on faith, not magnetism; their compass needles point whichever way they want them to point, with no fixed power to guide them.

Sagan didn’t write that long ago. A child born in 1995 just voted in her first national election — we hope. Perhaps she didn’t bother to register, and did not vote. What causes our national lack of motivation to even vote, to push our government in the directions we think it should go?

How do we remove the barriers to that motivation? is a more important question.

Was Sagan right? Are we doomed?

We have cause to worry, I think.

  • 58% of Americans eligible to vote, voted in 2016. While that’s near a recent high-water mark, it’s a paltry percentage compared to other democracies in the world. Apathy was highest in key states Donald Trump carried; Hillary Clinton won the popular vote, but trailed President Barack Obama’s 2012 totals by 2 million votes, in those key states. 2016’s election was decided by people who did not vote.
  • While tensions run high in the Korean Peninsula, only about 36% of Americans can find Korea on a map. Most of those who can find Korea favor diplomacy to resolve tensions, not war. Who was the wag who said God gives us wars so Americans learn geography? (It was Rose-Belford’s Canadian Monthly in 1879, rephrased and repeated dozens of times by others.)
  • Flat Earthers? Oy.
  • Anti-vaccine movement. Chem-trails fearfuls. Climate change dissenters. Creationists. Moon-landing deniers. Racists. So-called non-racists who oppose immigration completely. Republican senators who imagined a tax cut for the wealthy would help working and poor Americans have better health. DDT advocates. “Libertarians” and so-called conservatives who fear “socialism” of the economics of John Maynard Keynes, one of the foremost capitalism defenders in economics.
  • Cuts to education. As a barometer, consider Texas, where 25 years ago the state provided 67% of funding for public schools. After decades of cuts, the state provides only 38% of public school funding in the 2017-2019 budget. Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick touts the total as an increase.
  • Cuts to science. Trump administration proposals slash all science research dramatically, as if we already have cures for cancer and the common cold, and Alzheimer’s disease.

To be sure, we can find pockets of hope. Girl Scouts demonstrate great success with new programs to attract girls to careers in science, with special camps for Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM). Boy Scouts have their own initiative. But the Texas legislature cut back on math, science and geography requirements for graduation. For every hopeful sign, there’s another sinister sign.

How can we tell civilization, and humanity, gain ground?

 

Pollsters for the New York Times asked 1,746 Americans to locate North Korea on a map. 36% could do it; many of the guesses are troubling, if not downright shocking. In the map above, from the New York Times, correct answers are marked in red, incorrect in blue.

Pollsters for the New York Times asked 1,746 Americans to locate North Korea on a map. 36% could do it; many of the guesses are troubling, if not downright shocking. In the map above, from the New York Times, correct answers are marked in red, incorrect in blue.

“Science as a candle in the dark” is a good image.

How can we provide light in the darkness, if we don’t have a candle, and we can’t find matches?

More:

The Tweet that piqued my interest tonight:
https://twitter.com/KStreetHipster/status/894574338409672708

 

 

Save

Save

Save

Save

Save


Serena Williams is REALLY good

March 16, 2017

Serena Williams portrait in the New York Times Magazine. Credit Christopher Griffith for The New York Times. Stylist: Sarah Schussheim. Hair: Johnnie Sapong. Makeup: Fiona Stiles

Serena Williams portrait in the New York Times Magazine. Credit Christopher Griffith for The New York Times. Stylist: Sarah Schussheim. Hair: Johnnie Sapong. Makeup: Fiona Stiles

Tough to track down the original screen capture — genius in recognizing it, whoever did it first — but it’s clear that Serena Williams is one of the better things to come out of America, and to some, America’s only hope in a time of Trump.

Headlines make it appear Serena Williams has a more effective foreign policy and military deterrent than the U.S. under Trump’s regime.

https://twitter.com/natemcdermott/status/842038491026456578

https://twitter.com/MaxKennerly/status/842047892378509317

You get the idea.

Two copy editors in different departments write headlines, and they get mashed up by a third editor or some robot. Hope results. Not vain hope, we hope.

Two copy editors in different departments write headlines, and they get mashed up by a third editor or some robot. Hope results. Not vain hope, we hope.

Didn’t know it was an old screen cap — hadn’t seen it before. It’s timely again, and I needed the laugh.

http://twitter.com/BN2187/status/842239477171027969

 

https://twitter.com/mytweetmark/status/838362815031279616

More:


Here’s the photo of Obama the GOP hope Americans never see

May 17, 2013

It’s a prize-winning photograph by “Scout Tufankjian, an independent photographer whose portfolio includes a book of photographs from Obama’s first run for the White House.”

Scout Tufankjian's award-nominated photograph of Barack and Michelle Obama in East Davenport, Iowa, in 2012.

Barack and Michelle Obama in Booth No. 3 at Lagomarcino’s in the Village of East Davenport, Iowa, during the 2012 election campaign

Photographs sometimes reveal truths, and sometimes those truths are wonderful, and smile-making.

Bill Wundram’s column discusses the photo, in the Quad-City Times (it’s worth the click to read it).

THE QUIETUDE of the soda fountain booth was a marked difference from a rousing Obama appearance a half-hour earlier at a curb-to-curb outdoor rally.

After the speech, the Obamas adjourned to the cool of Lago’s. Tom had  prepared for them to be seated in Booth No. 3.

“The Obamas were shaking so many hands before coming into our soda shop that I had to make three different chocolate sundaes for them.” Tom says. “They kept melting.”

You can see all the photos in this Sony contest in a slide show, here.

More:


What news organizations need to know about “no-fly” zones over disaster areas

April 4, 2013

Lots of chatter around the internet today on the discovery that the Federal Aviation Agency posted a notice making the area over the oil spill in Arkansas off limits to aircraft.

Some people claimed they were certain that it was because Exxon-Mobil paid to get a special favor; others wondered why the government would be complicit in such a deal. Several of the comments linked to aerial photos of the spill, and said ‘obviously’ Exxon Mobil doesn’t want photos of the severity  of the spill to get out.  Bill McKibben’s tweet alerted me to the controversy (take a look at that video, too).

Actually, it’s common procedure to make sport flying and other unnecessary flying over disasters, off limits — FAA has a special set of regulations for that.  Rescuers and disaster fighters, and relief workers,  don’t want sight-seers on visual flight rules posing hazards to flights necessary to work on disaster relief or clean up of a spill of a toxic or hazardous substance.

But this doesn’t mean that news organizations cannot fly — in fact, there is a special regulation to ALLOW news aircraft over the zone, for photography and other reports.

Here’s the notice at FAA’s website (I’m sure that link will be unworkable in a few weeks):

FAA notification, NOTAMs notice of Mayflower, Arkansas, temporary flight restrictions; screen grab April 3, 2013.

FAA notification, NOTAMs notice of Mayflower, Arkansas, temporary flight restrictions; screen grab April 3, 2013.

Most announcements of restrictions of any public activity by a federal agency contain a notice of from where the agency draws that authority; I didn’t include it in the screen grab, but FAA notes the authority flows from Title 14 CFR section 91.137(a)(2).  That’s the Code of Federal Regulations, the set of volumes that list all the regulations the federal government has.  This was also published in the Federal Register — and I suspect the NOTAMs is also published there — but CFR is the more permanent set of books for finding government rules.

In the interests of open government, of course the FAA makes these rules available online.  They are available at several sites.  Here’s the meat of the regulation:

Section 2. Temporary Flight Restrictions in the Vicinity of Disaster/Hazard Areas (14 CFR Section 91.137)

19-2-1. PURPOSE

This section prescribes guidelines and procedures regarding the management of aircraft operations in the vicinity of disaster/hazard areas in accordance with 14 CFR Section 91.137. TFRs issued under this section are for disaster/hazard situations that warrant regulatory measures to restrict flight operations for a specified amount of airspace, on a temporary basis, in order to provide protection of persons or property in the air or on the ground.

19-2-2. RATIONALE

TFRs in accordance with 14 CFR Section 91.137 are issued when necessary to:

a. 14 CFR 91.137(a)(1) – Protect persons and property on the surface or in the air from an existing or imminent hazard associated with an incident on the surface when the presence of low flying aircraft would magnify, alter, spread, or compound that hazard.

b. 14 CFR 91.137(a)(2) – Provide a safe environment for the operation of disaster relief aircraft.

c. 14 CFR 91.137(a)(3) – Prevent an unsafe congestion of sightseeing and other aircraft above an incident or event that may generate a high degree of public interest.

NOTE-
This provision applies only to disaster/hazard incidents of limited duration that would attract an unsafe congestion of sightseeing aircraft.

Specific  rules of restrictions, who in the FAA declares them, who can grant waivers, and to who the restrictions apply, get spelled out following that  part.

Notice that, generally, these restrictions apply only to flights below 1,000 feet.  A good camera in a television station’s helicopter can get a lot of great shots from 1,000 feet out (three football fields) — this is a distance often seen in the videos of police car chases.  So it’s not a complete ban.

Savvy news organizations will know how to get news photos using the specific exemption for news aircraft, with procedures spelled out so the FAA knows it’s a news gathering operation; I’ve put the critical clauses in red:

c. Section 91.137(a)(3). Restrictions issued in accordance with this section prohibit all aircraft from operating in the designated area unless at least one of the following conditions is met:

1. The operation is conducted directly to or from an airport within the area, or is necessitated by the impracticability of VFR flight above or around the area due to weather or terrain, and the operation is not conducted for the purpose of observing the incident or event. Notification must be given to the ATC facility that was specified in the NOTAM for coordination with the official in charge of the activity.

2. The aircraft is operating under an ATC approved IFR flight plan.

3. The aircraft is carrying incident or event personnel, or law enforcement officials.

4. The aircraft is carrying properly accredited news representatives and, prior to entering that area, a flight plan is filed with FSS or the ATC facility specified in the NOTAM. Flight plans must include aircraft identification, type, and color; radio frequencies to be used; proposed times of entry to and exit from the TFR area; the name of news media or organization and purpose of flight.

Well-run news organizations already know this; in an age when more and more news rooms operate on a shoe string, it may be that this information about how to cover disasters is not passed along in the newsroom, though.  So I’m reposting it here, so you’ll know, so news organizations now, so environmental reporters can get a copy of the regulations  to carry with them when they head out to cover spills, fires, floods, and other disasters.

I’m waiting, too.  It’s only a matter of time until somebody figures out a local kid has a good radio control helicopter, and it can carry a GoPro camera; or until a local news station invests in a news-gathering drone.  Here in Texas, we’ve already had one environmental disaster uncovered by a drone operated by a guy just checking on real estate.

If you see some footage of the disaster filmed on or after April 3, would you let us know, in comments?

And spread the word to any reporters you know.

More:

Amateur video of the spill:


Fox News, still geographically challenged (Arkansas? What’s that?)

September 15, 2012

Bret Corum calls our attention to another Fox News remaking of the map of the world:

Fox News lost Arkansas, moved Missouri

Misreporting the news is bad enough — but changing the map? Nations go to war over such things . . .

It appears that, in the Fox News view of the world, Missouri conquered Arkansas, and Alabama and Mississippi either swapped spouses and houses, or are in the middle of some geographic square dance, and the satellite caught them in the middle of a do-si-do into each other’s old territory.

Look on the bright side — so far they only screwed up 8% of the United States with their mapping errors.  On the other hand, they named nine states, and made four errors — 55% correct.  That’s probably not a passing score even under No Child Left Behind rules.

One gets the sinking feeling that such sloppiness with the facts infects everything Fox does, though.

I wonder what kinds of errors and screw-ups one could find, if one seriously paid attention to what Fox claims.

More:

  • Why Fox News – yet again – needs a copy editor (apple.copydesk.org)  (Charles Apple’s column on news design is always a good read — but this piece lists several, maybe a hundred, other instances of copy editor-less screw-ups on the news and other places.  God bless copy editors, and let’s hope these errors were all caused by a lack of one.)

Tip of the old scrub brush to the ever-vigilant, accuracy stickler Bret Corum.


Walter Cronkite – gone three years

July 17, 2012

Walter Cronkite died on July 17, 2009.

I miss his broadcasts, still, and they were gone a good 20 years earlier.

Here’s an earlier post on Cronkite:

Walter Cronkite at his office typewriter:

Walter Cronkite at his typewriter, in his office

Walter Cronkite at his typewriter, in his office – from The Typewriter blog

Pipe rack to his left, on the shelf above; full set of the Encyclopedia Britannica to his right (probably a 1960s set); A lot of books, some dealing with space exploration, among his favorite topics; models of the X-15 and early versions of the Space Shuttle; award from the Boy Scouts to his right, where he can see it easily.

When was this photo taken? 1970s? Earlier? Maybe someone who follows Dixie Cups could date the cup to Cronkite’s left.

This is probably the same office, redecorated, and stripped down to move – and with a different typewriter (a Smith-Corona electric?):

Cronkite in his office minutes before his final broadcast.  SF Chronicle photo

Caption from the San Francisco Chronicle website: “In this March 6, 1981 file photo, Walter Cronkite talks on the phone at his office, prior to his final newscast as CBS anchorman in New York City. Behind him is a framed Mickey Mouse cartoon and his Emmy award. Famed CBS News anchor Walter Cronkite, known as the ‘most trusted man in America’ has died, Friday, July 17, 2009. He was 92.”

More:


Arab Spring spreads to Europe?

January 16, 2012

English: Emil Boc speaking.

Romanian Prime Minister Emil Boc - Image via Wikipedia

Eric Koenig wondered, and wrote:

On December 17, 1989, Romanian security forces fired into a crowd in the city of Timişoara. Scarcely a week later, the Romanian revolution was over and Nicolae Ceaușescu and his wife had been toppled and tried and summarily executed. Now thousands of people are protesting in Romania and calling for the ouster of their President (who has been in some political hot water himself, being “suspended” briefly and narrowly escaping impeachment in 2007, during his first term) and many of the protests started in the same city.

Is history repeating itself?  Stay tuned …

http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/International/2012/Jan-15/159949-romania-protests-spread-despite-health-bill-withdrawal.ashx#axzz1je7ndQhJ

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-16570860

The story isn’t being followed by many US newspapers. Yet.

I think it’s not quite so simple, nor a repeat of 22 years ago.  Romanians protest austerity cuts to their government-paid health plans, according to BBC:

Romanian Prime Minister Emil Boc has called for dialogue and an end to violence after four days of protests against austerity cuts.

Dozens of people were hurt on Sunday, as demonstrators and riot police clashed for a second day running in the capital Bucharest.

The rallies began in support of an official who quit in protest against health care reforms.

But they have grown into a broader hostility towards government policies.

The alliance of opposition parties has called for early elections.

I think the economic grievances are not of the same kind as those in Africa and Arabia, nor are they so deep as the extreme discontent with Ceaușescu’s communist government 22 years ago.

But, who can tell what’s really going on?  We have to depend on reports from Lebanese newspapers, and rewrites of those stories from the Associated Press?

Government change poses astonishing opportunities in the past year, especially these home-grown, nationalist liberation movements.  New resources, cut back from a century ago, leave us without eyes and ears on the ground in too many foreign capitals.

English: Grave of the former dictator Nicolae ...

Bucharest grave of former Romanian dictator Nicolae Ceaușescu - Image via Wikipedia

Why aren’t we hearing more about the Romanian crisis in U.S. news media?  Well, there’s the war in Afghanistan, the ending war in Iraq, and trouble in Nigeria.  Then there is the South Carolina circus.   For all I know, American Idol is in the news today, too.

It’s not like either you are, or I am, Marie, the Queen of Roumania, right?  What could go wrong that might affect us?

Watch.  U.S. papers will pick up the story in small snippets over the next week or so.

Could you find Romania on an unlabeled map?

Map of Romania, from GreenwichMeanTime.com

Map of Romania, from GreenwichMeanTime.com

Location map of Romania, GreenwhichMeanTime.com

Location map of Romania, GreenwhichMeanTime.com


Encore post: “Don’t play chicken with the debt ceiling!”

July 30, 2011

If only they had listened last April when I first posted this!

A blast from the past:

BusinessWeek cover, April 18-24, 2011 - Don't play chicken with debt ceiling

BusinessWeek cover, April 18-24, 2011 - Don't play chicken with debt ceiling; chicken image by Jan Hamus/Alamy

Not every one of the Bloomberg Businessweek covers has been a hit, but a lot of them are — vastly more entertaining since Bloomberg took over the old workhorse magazine.

This one packs a political punch along with visual excitement.

And it’s right. Do any Republicans pay attention to the finance and business worlds anymore?

Articles inside are informative, too — see Peter Coy’s article, and did you see the article on the debt ceiling issue and the views of past Treasury secretaries?

Hey! Republicans! Stop playing chicken with the nation’s credit, will you?

Graphic - dangerous game on debt ceiling -- Businessweek

Businessweek graphic from April 18-24, 2011 issue - click for larger view at Businessweek site; chicken image by Jan Hamus/Alamy


Troops who fought in two wars now protect public against Missouri River flood and nuclear accident

July 10, 2011

Hoax claims died down a bit across the blogosphere, but the Missouri River still floods, and the two Nebraska nuclear power plants on the Missouri still face threats from the flood.

Comes news via the Omaha World-Herald that members of Nebraska’s and Iowa’s Air National Guard — many of them veterans of Iraq or Afghanistan — patrol the levees, helping protect against floods.  Among points of special concern are the nuclear power plants at Fort Calhoun and Cooper.

The military helicopter’s black shadow dances on an engorged Missouri River as the aircraft slowly loops the flood-encircled Fort Calhoun Nuclear Station — the same left-leaning turns the pilot navigated two days prior.

Warrant Officer Boe Searight, 32, with the Nebraska Air National Guard wants the infrared camera mounted under the chopper to record similar flood scenes for levee experts on the ground to compare.

He and his colleague Chief Warrant Officer 2 Eric Schriner also are looking for new signs of trouble for the flooded plant.

“Keep daily eyes on it and see if anything changes,” says Schriner, 31.

Far below, on mosquito-infested riverbanks, two-person crews with the Nebraska National Guard and Iowa National Guard patrol the Omaha and Council Bluffs levees in mud-caked boots.

Members of the Guard are the front-line levee watchers in an operation that clearly has high stakes: Levees protect about 40,000 people from homelessness in the neighboring river cities — as well as the region’s key airport.

The levee watchers are out there right now — three shifts a day, all week, searching for gopher holes, chasing away sightseers who could fall from the levees, and checking for signs of water seepage.

More than 130 men and women with the Nebraska Army and Air National Guard work each day for flood duty, along with 120 from the Iowa Army and Air National Guard.

The idea is to spot trouble early. Levees don’t always give notice before they rupture, but more often than not they do.

If trouble is spotted, steps can be taken to shore up or boost a weakened levee.

Good to know.  Still no nuclear incident along the lines of the hoax report from the Pakistani outlet alleged to be based on a report from a Russian agency — which is also good news — but no cause for abatement of overall concern.

Sometimes safety preparations work.  Kudos to the Air National Guards, to the Nuclear Regulatory Agency, and to the companies who own  the power plants.  May their work continue to pay off in no nuclear incidents.

Idaho Samizdat noted earlier that the bizarre conspiracy theories haven’t borne out as accurate or true in the least:

The flooding situation in Nebraska has been the subject of bizarre conspiracy theories originating in Russia and Pakistan alleging that a meltdown has occurred at Ft. Calhoun and that the government is covering it up.

One U.S. web site, Business Insider, ran with the story as legitimate and set off a huge round of copy cat reports on the Internet.

Reports of a U.S. news blackout are also part of the conspiracy theory even though Nebraska papers such as the Omaha World-Herald and the New York Times have run major stories on measures by the two reactor sites to prevent the flood waters from reaching important infrastructure such as switch yards


Hoaxed Nebraska nuclear plant crisis update

June 24, 2011

Help me out, Dear Reader:  Here is the English language site of the Russian Federal Atomic Energy Agency (FAEE), the press site.  Can you find any statement at this site relating to the power plants in Nebraska along the flooding Missouri River?

Fires in Japan after tsunami -- not a nuclear power station

What some reports appear to paint as the Nebraska nuclear generating stations (However, please note: In this photo, no nuclear power plants appear)

Cooper nuclear generation station in 1993 floods

What you really see: Cooper Nuclear Generating Station in Nebraska -- still there (from a 1993 photo)

I have found no mention of any U.S. incident.   This suggests the Pakistani news report of a Russian agency report of disaster is hoax, too.

Claims of a crisis in Nebraska are hoaxes,  I think.  The Russian agency from which the report is claimed to have come, does not show such a report.

This is more evidence that the whole flap is a hoax.

True to form, several birther and other conspiracy paranoiac sites claim that these plants in Nebraska are gone, in flames, or leaking water that nearly glows.

Can’t Sarah Palin point her bus to Nebraska and let her press entourage get the real story?